Understanding
and knowing the impact of hurricanes is always of interest during this time of
the year. Hurricane season in the Atlantic begins June 1st and ends November 30th.
The Eastern Pacific hurricane season begins May 15th and also ends November 30th
(“National Hurricane Center”). One of the agencies that does hurricane
monitoring is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Up until recently NOAA has used a small
variety of manned aircraft to accomplish tracking and researching hurricanes. One
of those manned aircraft is the Lockheed WP-3D Orion. NOAA has described the Orion as a “versatile
turboprop aircraft” because of the Orion’s “unprecedented variety of scientific
instrumentation, radars and recording systems ("Lockheed WP-3D
Orion").” The WP-3D Orion has
played a pivotal role in data collection and research of hurricanes, this “data
is to help forecasters make accurate predictions during a hurricane; and to
help NOAA researchers achieve a better understanding of storm processes,
thereby improving their forecast models ("NOAA’s “Hurricane Hunter”
Aircraft Lockheed WP-3D Orion ").” The overall effective range and crew
requirements of the WP-3D Orion is as follows: For lower altitudes the aircraft
can operate an area of 2500 nautical miles or 9.5 hours, alternatively at
higher altitudes the aircraft has an effective range of 3800 nautical miles or
11.5 hours. The crew consists of 2 Pilots, Flight Engineer, Navigator, Flight
Director (meteorologist), 2 or 3 Engineering/Electronic specialists,
Radio/Avionics specialist, and a up to 12 Scientist or Media personnel.
An
alternative to this mission would be the use of an unmanned aircraft system
(UAS). One of the platforms that NOAA has actively acquired in conjunction with
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is the Global Hawk
UAS. “For the last five years, NOAA has teamed up with NASA to fly NASA’s
Global Hawk unmanned aircraft to get an inside look at how hurricanes form and
intensify over the Atlantic (Allen, "New mission for the Global
Hawk").” The HS3 Global Hawk is a
capable UAS that provides an endurance of over 24 hours and an effective range
of 12,300 nautical miles ("U.S. Air Force"), almost quadruple that of
the manned WP-3D Orion. Another capable
UAS used by both NOAA and NASA is the Aerosonde UAS. The Aerosonde UAS was
utilized on September 16th, 2005, to observe and fly into tropical
storm Ophelia. At the time, Ophelia was a 55kt tropical storm and was located
off the North Carolina coastline ("NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems").
The ability for this particular UAS intercept the tropical storm proved to be
critical, as it was “capable of flying at altitudes of 500 feet or less within
the high-wind hurricane eyewall environment. This is thousands of feet lower
than any manned aircraft is able to operate ("NOAA Unmanned Aircraft
Systems").” Again this UAS has a much higher endurance, within the realm
of 30 hours ("NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems"), to perform a similar mission
to the WP-3D Orion. The last and final
UAS up for consideration is Raytheon’s Coyote. This UAS is also used by NOAA in
their efforts to collect better data on hurricanes. According to NOAA the
Coyote is “dropped from a free fall chute in the belly of the plane, the Coyote
is designed to then open its six-foot wingspan and fly through the storm (Pomerleau,
"NOAA drones drop in on hurricanes -- GCN").” Like the Aerosonde, the
Coyote is capable of collecting data of hurricanes at much lower altitudes,
something manned aircraft just cannot do safely(Pomerleau, "NOAA drones
drop in on hurricanes -- GCN").
The capability to use a more cost effective means of tracking hurricanes is one of the benefits using any of these UAS provide. Additionally the data that is collected because of these UAS’s capacity to stay aloft longer can prove to be beneficial in the long-term. From Raytheon’s website they cite that the Coyote “meets current P-3 mission requirements and is developed and tested to save lives, reduce operational costs and provide tactical surveillance data ("Raytheon").” These benefits and cost savings grossly outweigh the use of manned aircraft and should prove to be a valuable asset in the future.
The capability to use a more cost effective means of tracking hurricanes is one of the benefits using any of these UAS provide. Additionally the data that is collected because of these UAS’s capacity to stay aloft longer can prove to be beneficial in the long-term. From Raytheon’s website they cite that the Coyote “meets current P-3 mission requirements and is developed and tested to save lives, reduce operational costs and provide tactical surveillance data ("Raytheon").” These benefits and cost savings grossly outweigh the use of manned aircraft and should prove to be a valuable asset in the future.
There are problems with using these unmanned
aircraft systems however, and that extends from legal issues. This legal issue is the certificate of
authorization (COA) required from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
operate those unmanned systems commercially. The COA allows an operator to use
a defined block of airspace and includes special safety provisions unique to
the proposed operation. COAs usually are issued for a specific period – up to
two years in many cases ("Public Operations (Governmental)"). Many of
these UAS’s operate in areas where there is not aircraft, not too many aircraft
are willingly flying towards a hurricane, but there is still that requirement
to do so legally. In regards to ethical challenges, there are not too many that
are opposed to better tracking of a potential disaster. One that comes to mind
is the possibility of wasting materials (systems like the Coyote not being
always being recovered) and the potential for one of these UAS to crash into
the ocean. This stems from an environmental standpoint and could pose a threat
to wildlife in the immediate vicinity of the hurricane and the aftermath of
spilled fuel, should one of the UAS malfunction or be enveloped in the storm.
This particular type of mission appears to be an “ideal”
mission for UAS, and most certainly agrees with the type of dirty, dull, and
dangerous operations we most associate with UAS. The greatest challenge that
these systems will face is the shear amount of data that they provide, and the
time that will be required to analyze such data. In a give and take
relationship however, the tradeoff appears promising, as scientists are granted
a better glimpse of what is going on inside of hurricanes with the potential to
create better forecasting models.
References
Allen, M. (2014,
September 11). New mission for the Global Hawk. Retrieved September 20, 2015,
from
http://research.noaa.gov/News/NewsArchive/LatestNews/TabId/684/ArtMID/1768/ArticleID/10742/New-mission-for-the-Global-Hawk-.aspx
Lockheed WP-3D
Orion. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from
http://www.aoc.noaa.gov/aircraft_lockheed.htm
NOAA Unmanned
Aircraft Systems. (2005). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from
http://uas.noaa.gov/projects/demos/aerosonde/Ophelia_final.html
NOAA’s “Hurricane
Hunter” Aircraft Lockheed WP-3D Orion. (2005, June 1). Retrieved September 20,
2015, from http://www.aoc.noaa.gov/Backgrounders/Lockheed WP-3D Orion.pdf
National Hurricane
Center. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/
Pomerleau, M.
(2015, June 18). NOAA drones drop in on hurricanes -- GCN. Retrieved September
20, 2015, from http://gcn.com/articles/2015/06/18/noaa-hurricane-drones.aspx
Public Operations
(Governmental). (n.d.). Retrieved September 21, 2015, from https://www.faa.gov/uas/public_operations/
Raytheon. (n.d.).
Retrieved September 20, 2015, from
http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/coyote/
U.S. Air Force.
(2014, October 1). Retrieved September 20, 2015, from
http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104516/rq-4-global-hawk.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment