Tuesday, December 20, 2016

BLOS Operations ASCI 638 Assignment 4-6

BLOS Operations
Scott E. Leishman
ASCI 638- Human Factors in Unmanned Aero Sys
Assignment 4.6
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
December 15, 2016


Introduction
For the purpose of this assignment I am reviewing the Global Hawk Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). The Global Hawk is used as a High-altitude, Long-Endurance (HALE) UAS. It was designed to be a persistent reconnaissance UAS for use at the Joint Force command. This was a program initiative enacted by the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office (DARO) (Pike, n.d.). The Global Hawk is equipped with a variety of sensors and amongst those sensors the following are included: an electro-optical sensor (EO), an infrared sensor (IR), and a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) vision system. These systems can be operated either line-of-sight (LOS) via a radio data link, or they can be operated via Ku-band satellite communication (SATCOM) data link for command, control, and communication purposes(C3)(Pike,n.d.) during beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) operations.  When using BLOS, via the Ku-Band SATCOM, this C3 link is able to provide a 50-megabit per second connection, which allows a throughput of several million gigabytes (Gb) of video and imagery during a continuous operation( this UAS is capable of a 24 hour operation due to its endurance). Along with having an outstanding ability to record data, this airframe can carry upwards of 3,000lbs. of interchangeable payload and can reach altitudes of well over 60,000 feet.
Satellite Communication
The SATCOM over Ku-Band data link is typically used whenever the UAS is expected to operate BLOS.  It does this because of how SATCOMS are leveraged. SATCOM uses low-earth polar along with geo-stationary orbits to establish various air/ground telecommunications. The ground infrastructure provides controls for position of a satellite and monitor the health of the usable satellite (Duncan, 2015).  The primary providers of aviation communications via satellite are Inmarsat and iridium. Iridium utilizes an immense network of 66 cross-linked satellites (with seven of them being backups), and this network covers the majority of the Polar Regions, airways, as well as Earth’s Oceans (Duncan Aviation, 2016). The orbit for this satellite network circumvents the globe once every 100 minutes, with at altitude that is nearly 485 miles above Earth’s surface. In doing so this network provides uninterrupted voice communications throughout the world (Duncan Aviation, 2016). Comparatively, Iridium is the private sector leader and is the primary consumer telecommunication provider, by proxy Inmarsat is more of a legacy system of international satellite service providers. What Inmarsat proves is data rate transfers upwards of 432 kilo bytes per second (kbps) over a network of 11 multi-use satellites, not to include those areas designated in Polar Regions (Duncan Aviation, 2016). Inmarsat is the more desirable satellite infrastructure for Government and Civil Authorities due to its compatibility and compliance with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards. Inmarsat becomes more desirable because it meets future needs of an integrated global traffic management system, also referred to as the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network (ATN) (Duncan Aviation, 2016). Inmarsat’s infrastructure is built in a manner to support information transfer between aircraft operators, service providers, passenger’s onboard large and commercial commuter aircraft and, air traffic providers (Duncan Aviation, 2016).
Global Hawk Infrastructure
Because the Global Hawk operates autonomously, use of a ground-based infrastructure eliminates the need for a lot of aircrew to gather information, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) information when comparing it to other aircraft (Northrop Grumman, 2012). In doing this, this platform enables more time in the ground control station (GCS) that other manned aircraft systems (Northrop Grumman, 2012).  The Global Hawk personnel handle the command, control, aircraft management, and sensors operations from a Mission Control Element (MCE) (Northrop Grumman, 2012). This is a shelter where communication to the vehicle, mission planning, and imagery quality control take place. The systems within the MCE are operated similarly to those of a manned system. The processes for supply, management systems, maintenance, and equipment/components are the same for manned aircraft with the exception being manuals, which are electronic with visual illustrations, and maintenance manuals come preloaded on a ruggedized laptop that is utilized when troubleshooting and ordering parts for the Global Hawk (Northrop Grumman, 2012).
The Global Hawk runs effectively because of how LOS and BLOS control work with each other and allow the aircraft to operate virtually anywhere around the world. BLOS operations become crucial for this UAS because of the primary missions the Global hawk serves. Using BLOS enables the aircraft to have long range surveillance, and gives the platform the ability to operate overseas, while the operators are stateside. BLOS operations are carried out similar to the Predator drone, which uses several repeaters to establish communications between relay points (Brown, 2015).  These repeaters can either be active or passive. When considering what each is, we consider passive repeaters to include components which are land based, essentially those that do not require supplied power to relay a signal to the next receiver in the communication chain (Brown, 2015). These repeaters work particularly well in remote areas where landmass obstructions and mountainous terrain often exist. Comparatively, an active repeater is one that would include a transmitter and receiver that would bounce a received signal to the next link via a LOS signal chain, but can also be amplified to relay signals, data and can be transmitted continuously by changing the frequency streams of satellite data-links when using Ku-band.  BLOS systems that operate via a bounced signal utilizing multiple repeaters can have a tendency to be distorted over time and distance (Brown, 2015). This creates a signal that is not only distorted, but can also become slower as it passes through each of the repeaters in that infrastructure (Brown, 2015).  For this reason the Global Hawk is at greater risk of errors and corruption and can lead to delays with that system which would make manual control of this platform exceptionally risky. For that reason, lost-link scenarios within LOS become easier to fix, because there are less communication components at play (Brown, 2015).
Conclusion
            A very distinct disadvantage for this platform is similar to other platforms in that it can create problems when handing the UAS from one GCS to another. The potential delay leads to possible anomalies in not only aircraft settings but configuration as well. This false positive is a huge human factors concern, as it can be misleading. An operator may have a read out of a different altitude or heading when the aircraft is being turned over to another GCS, but the UAS has performed that step moments ago and is now at a lower altitude or a different heading, leading to poor situational awareness. These delays at BLOS essentially eliminate any possible positive control in manual operation, and leaves the aircraft susceptible to a mishap or an incident.
            Although the Global Hawk has an abundance of advantages and use in private applications, much of the regulatory framework in place limits operations within the National Airspace System due to lost link concerns BLOS. When the platform is able to meet regulatory framework and the Federal Aviation Administration can provide guidance, these platforms can lend a hand in many different applications. Anything from search and rescue missions, to 3D mapping of terrain and cities ("Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems Association Commercial Applications", 2016).
References
Brown, J. (2015). Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) and the MQ9 Reaper. Droning on and on. Retrieved from http://www.droningonandon.com/blog/beyond-line-of-sight-and-the-mq9-reaper
Duncan Aviation,. (2016). What Is Satcom? | Straight Talk About Satcom & HSDArchive.da.aero. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from http://archive.da.aero/straighttalk/satcom/what_is_satcom.php
Northrop Grumman,. (2012). Q-4 EnterpriseGlobal Hawk Capabilities Brochure. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/GlobalHawk/Documents/Brochure_Q4_HALE_Enterprise.pdf
Pike, J. Global Hawk (Tier II+ HAE UAV)Fas.org. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://fas.org/irp/program/collect/global_hawk.htm
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems Association Commercial Applications. (2016). Uavs.org. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://www.uavs.org/commercial




Tuesday, December 6, 2016

UAS GCS Human Factors Issue Assignment 2.5 ASCI 638

Human factors of MQ-5B Hunter
Scott E. Leishman
ASCI 638- Human Factors in Unmanned Aero Sys
Assignment 2.5
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
November 29, 2016

Unmanned Aerospace system
For this assignment I chose the MQ-5B Hunter. This tactical Unmanned aircraft system is a long endurance, medium altitude multi-mission (UAS). In particular this UAS was enhanced to provide the Army with a steadfast aircraft that was capable of keep constant Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) in the battlefield. The MQ-5B conducts battlefield surveillance using multiple sensors, including its multi-mission EO/IR/LD/LRF/Illuminator and Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) payloads ("MQ5B Hunter-Capabilities"). This system utilizes JAUS or Joint architecture for unmanned systems. JAUS is a common language enabling internal and external communication between unmanned systems.
Common architecture and elements. This UAS employs a GCS-3000 ground control station (GCS) which is typically manned with two operators (A pilot and a sensor operator/navigator). It allows the UAS to track, command, control and communicate with not only the air vehicle but the payloads onboard as well. The GCS is capable of controlling up to 2 air vehicles at a time using one GCS. The GCS comes equipped with a digital terrain and elevation data, as well as CD ROM map data and data from the Defense Mapping Agency (DMA) ("Hunter RQ-5A / MQ-5B/C UAV, United States of America"). 
Command and control strategy. This unmanned air vehicle can operated either from a paved or a semi-paved runway or can be launched via a rocket assisted takeoff system (RATO).  The RATO launch is useful on board small ships and in areas where space is limited. This UAS has an automated takeoff and landing component to it and the GCS is setup in four bays. The four bays are as follows: Pilot bay(controls flight of UAS),  Observer bay (payload functions), and a Navigation bay, which has a digital map display which will trace the flight path and monitor mission progress and finally the intelligence pay which incorporates data processing and distribution capabilities. ("Hunter RQ-5A / MQ-5B/C UAV, United States of America"). Northrop Grumman data sheet dictates the main logic controller for this system is the BLK II OSGCS (One station ground control system) with ATLS (automatic takeoff and landing system). With the OSGCS, vehicle control station software is installed and allows for more automation in flights, in particular this UAS is equipped with VCS-4586 which according to Lockheed Martin  “Operators enjoy real-time control and monitoring capabilities through an intuitive point-and-click user-interface requiring only a keyboard and mouse (Lockheed Martin, 2016).”
Human factors issues
            Although this UAS has performed over 80,000 hours of operations, it still has human factors issues at play within the GCS. One of those issues is automation. While automation is one way to negate over saturating a task, it also eliminates common skills that are retained through constant use, i.e. piloting. Take this particular UAS, if for some reason any part of the communication link were to fail, and the GCS was no longer automated, the pilots would have to intervene, and if they forgot how to do something that is typically routine, for example landing, the results could be disastrous. To negate this issue, pilots should be able to override automation, and should balance automation with level of saturation. If the pilot has too many mission tasks, they should employ automation, but in the event that the pilot is only doing routine operations, automation should be limited to when the UAS is loitering or in times where pilot intervention would infrequently be needed. Another perceived human factor issue is displayed information used for this UAS within the GCS. While it is good to have access to as much information as possible, sensory overload can be another factor. This GCS could benefit from having a multimodal display that would advise pilots of important information. This would be extremely useful in events where an aircraft operated in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) or near IMC.
Conclusion
When we consider a design for a UAS and important functions for the GCS, every characteristic of that system should be properly evaluated to determine what the most effective and efficient roles are for the human operator and machine (Hunt, Rice, Geels, & Davis, 2012). We should assure that automation is not to exceed a level where the human operator can no longer operate the aircraft, but not take away automation to a point where the operator loses the ability to multi-task and take away from mission goals. Additionally, the flow of information is a crucial aspect of operating an aircraft properly. The flow of information needs to be widely understood by any and all individuals involved with that system and it should be effective and efficient as possible (Hunt, Rice, Geels, & Davis, 2012). Finally, the attributes of the hardware and software available between the man-machine interfaces should take into consideration how the users will interact with that technology. In addition to understanding the interaction between the hardware, software and human-machine interface, special attention should be given to possible lag times and other potential issues with the given technology suite(Hunt, Rice, Geels, & Davis, 2012).


References
Hunt, G., Rice, S., Geels, K., & Davis, D. (2012). Using Magpie Research to Determine the Top 10 Human Factors Issues in UAS for NATO FINAS. Proceedings Of The Human Factors And Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1524-1528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561303
Hunter RQ-5A / MQ-5B/C UAV, United States of America. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.army-technology.com/projects/hunter/
MQ5B Hunter-Capabilities. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/MQ5BHunter/Pages/default.aspx
MQ5B-Datasheet. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.northropgrumman.com/AboutUs/BusinessSectors/TechnicalServices/Documents/MQ-5B_Hunter.pdf
Lockheed Martin,. (2016). Retrieved 30 November 2016, from http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/cdl-systems/VCS.html