Tuesday, December 20, 2016

BLOS Operations ASCI 638 Assignment 4-6

BLOS Operations
Scott E. Leishman
ASCI 638- Human Factors in Unmanned Aero Sys
Assignment 4.6
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
December 15, 2016


Introduction
For the purpose of this assignment I am reviewing the Global Hawk Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). The Global Hawk is used as a High-altitude, Long-Endurance (HALE) UAS. It was designed to be a persistent reconnaissance UAS for use at the Joint Force command. This was a program initiative enacted by the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office (DARO) (Pike, n.d.). The Global Hawk is equipped with a variety of sensors and amongst those sensors the following are included: an electro-optical sensor (EO), an infrared sensor (IR), and a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) vision system. These systems can be operated either line-of-sight (LOS) via a radio data link, or they can be operated via Ku-band satellite communication (SATCOM) data link for command, control, and communication purposes(C3)(Pike,n.d.) during beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) operations.  When using BLOS, via the Ku-Band SATCOM, this C3 link is able to provide a 50-megabit per second connection, which allows a throughput of several million gigabytes (Gb) of video and imagery during a continuous operation( this UAS is capable of a 24 hour operation due to its endurance). Along with having an outstanding ability to record data, this airframe can carry upwards of 3,000lbs. of interchangeable payload and can reach altitudes of well over 60,000 feet.
Satellite Communication
The SATCOM over Ku-Band data link is typically used whenever the UAS is expected to operate BLOS.  It does this because of how SATCOMS are leveraged. SATCOM uses low-earth polar along with geo-stationary orbits to establish various air/ground telecommunications. The ground infrastructure provides controls for position of a satellite and monitor the health of the usable satellite (Duncan, 2015).  The primary providers of aviation communications via satellite are Inmarsat and iridium. Iridium utilizes an immense network of 66 cross-linked satellites (with seven of them being backups), and this network covers the majority of the Polar Regions, airways, as well as Earth’s Oceans (Duncan Aviation, 2016). The orbit for this satellite network circumvents the globe once every 100 minutes, with at altitude that is nearly 485 miles above Earth’s surface. In doing so this network provides uninterrupted voice communications throughout the world (Duncan Aviation, 2016). Comparatively, Iridium is the private sector leader and is the primary consumer telecommunication provider, by proxy Inmarsat is more of a legacy system of international satellite service providers. What Inmarsat proves is data rate transfers upwards of 432 kilo bytes per second (kbps) over a network of 11 multi-use satellites, not to include those areas designated in Polar Regions (Duncan Aviation, 2016). Inmarsat is the more desirable satellite infrastructure for Government and Civil Authorities due to its compatibility and compliance with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards. Inmarsat becomes more desirable because it meets future needs of an integrated global traffic management system, also referred to as the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network (ATN) (Duncan Aviation, 2016). Inmarsat’s infrastructure is built in a manner to support information transfer between aircraft operators, service providers, passenger’s onboard large and commercial commuter aircraft and, air traffic providers (Duncan Aviation, 2016).
Global Hawk Infrastructure
Because the Global Hawk operates autonomously, use of a ground-based infrastructure eliminates the need for a lot of aircrew to gather information, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) information when comparing it to other aircraft (Northrop Grumman, 2012). In doing this, this platform enables more time in the ground control station (GCS) that other manned aircraft systems (Northrop Grumman, 2012).  The Global Hawk personnel handle the command, control, aircraft management, and sensors operations from a Mission Control Element (MCE) (Northrop Grumman, 2012). This is a shelter where communication to the vehicle, mission planning, and imagery quality control take place. The systems within the MCE are operated similarly to those of a manned system. The processes for supply, management systems, maintenance, and equipment/components are the same for manned aircraft with the exception being manuals, which are electronic with visual illustrations, and maintenance manuals come preloaded on a ruggedized laptop that is utilized when troubleshooting and ordering parts for the Global Hawk (Northrop Grumman, 2012).
The Global Hawk runs effectively because of how LOS and BLOS control work with each other and allow the aircraft to operate virtually anywhere around the world. BLOS operations become crucial for this UAS because of the primary missions the Global hawk serves. Using BLOS enables the aircraft to have long range surveillance, and gives the platform the ability to operate overseas, while the operators are stateside. BLOS operations are carried out similar to the Predator drone, which uses several repeaters to establish communications between relay points (Brown, 2015).  These repeaters can either be active or passive. When considering what each is, we consider passive repeaters to include components which are land based, essentially those that do not require supplied power to relay a signal to the next receiver in the communication chain (Brown, 2015). These repeaters work particularly well in remote areas where landmass obstructions and mountainous terrain often exist. Comparatively, an active repeater is one that would include a transmitter and receiver that would bounce a received signal to the next link via a LOS signal chain, but can also be amplified to relay signals, data and can be transmitted continuously by changing the frequency streams of satellite data-links when using Ku-band.  BLOS systems that operate via a bounced signal utilizing multiple repeaters can have a tendency to be distorted over time and distance (Brown, 2015). This creates a signal that is not only distorted, but can also become slower as it passes through each of the repeaters in that infrastructure (Brown, 2015).  For this reason the Global Hawk is at greater risk of errors and corruption and can lead to delays with that system which would make manual control of this platform exceptionally risky. For that reason, lost-link scenarios within LOS become easier to fix, because there are less communication components at play (Brown, 2015).
Conclusion
            A very distinct disadvantage for this platform is similar to other platforms in that it can create problems when handing the UAS from one GCS to another. The potential delay leads to possible anomalies in not only aircraft settings but configuration as well. This false positive is a huge human factors concern, as it can be misleading. An operator may have a read out of a different altitude or heading when the aircraft is being turned over to another GCS, but the UAS has performed that step moments ago and is now at a lower altitude or a different heading, leading to poor situational awareness. These delays at BLOS essentially eliminate any possible positive control in manual operation, and leaves the aircraft susceptible to a mishap or an incident.
            Although the Global Hawk has an abundance of advantages and use in private applications, much of the regulatory framework in place limits operations within the National Airspace System due to lost link concerns BLOS. When the platform is able to meet regulatory framework and the Federal Aviation Administration can provide guidance, these platforms can lend a hand in many different applications. Anything from search and rescue missions, to 3D mapping of terrain and cities ("Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems Association Commercial Applications", 2016).
References
Brown, J. (2015). Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) and the MQ9 Reaper. Droning on and on. Retrieved from http://www.droningonandon.com/blog/beyond-line-of-sight-and-the-mq9-reaper
Duncan Aviation,. (2016). What Is Satcom? | Straight Talk About Satcom & HSDArchive.da.aero. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from http://archive.da.aero/straighttalk/satcom/what_is_satcom.php
Northrop Grumman,. (2012). Q-4 EnterpriseGlobal Hawk Capabilities Brochure. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/GlobalHawk/Documents/Brochure_Q4_HALE_Enterprise.pdf
Pike, J. Global Hawk (Tier II+ HAE UAV)Fas.org. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://fas.org/irp/program/collect/global_hawk.htm
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems Association Commercial Applications. (2016). Uavs.org. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://www.uavs.org/commercial




No comments:

Post a Comment